Concurrent Engineering vs Traditional Approach A comparison of the concurrent engineering model and the traditional model of product realization is shown in. As it can be seen, there are huge time savings when concurrent engineering is implemented in the design-to-manufacturing cycle of the product realization.

Advantages & Disadvantages. Evaluation of software by the customer. Advantages and Disadvantages of Spiral Model. 1732 Concurrent Engineering Advantages and disadvantages Advantages 1 because from ECE 155 at University of Waterloo, Waterloo.

Also the concurrent engineering method does not lead into problems of implementing the design in manufacturing such as costly engineering changes. This will result in reducing the overall product cost.

In the, once the design is made, all of the departments that are invilved in the product realization are expected to follow it although they have very little input in the design of the product. A frequently asked question is, how good the design can be without involvment of domain experts? Very often, the design team in the traditional model, do not have the knowledge and the skills to make a product that will be functional, of high quality and manufacturable.

After the design team completes its task, the production processes are designed based on the design of the product. Therefore, if the product is poorly designed, the ensuing processes will be poorly designed, too. Spybot Explorer File Scan Plugin there. For example, if the manufacturing department has a part, that is difficult to manufacture due to the poor design, considerable time will be expended in order to manufacture the part.

To accomplish this, sometimes, the manufacturing department introduces changes to the original design such as either updating the part tolerances or changing the number of parts in the design. At the same time, the changes in the product design may not be either communicated to others in the product realization process or too late to prevent decisions that are based on the original product design. At any rate the traditional model is vulnerable to a costly and error prone product realization. Figure 5 shows that while the CE design method begins with a cost target for the product, the traditional method has no such benchmark. Following the design stage, the CE team compares the derived cost of the product design to the targeted cost. Only if the estimated cost is lower or equal to the targeted cost, the production of the product can begin.

Such design discipline is essential to ensure that the price of the product is competitive in the market. It is obvious that by following the CE model all the disadvantages of the traditional model can be avoided. The difference in the two approaches will be more evident upon study of the overall production cost in the product's life cycle.